Personal meaning is considered to be one important thing that drives individual achievement. In addition, Frankl (in Wiebe, 2001) considers that a person who has a personal meaning that positive (fulfillment of personal meaning) in life, contributing to the hope and optimism and appreciate the occurrence of a bad period in the life cycle.
In the event of an incident or adverse event, personal meaning is believed to help bring the resurrection of the individual from unwanted circumstances. Frankl (in Wiebe, 2001) believes that the meaningfulness (significance) in life, associated with high self esteem and generous behavior towards others, while meaningless (ketidakbermaknaan) in life associated with the indifference or break away (diengagement).
Personal Meaning in some perspectivea. Perspectives of Relativity
Battista and Almond (in Visser, 1973) conducted research on a variety of different theories of personal meaning, and found that the meaning for each person is different, and the achievement of finding meaning itself is unique for each person. Battista and Almond tolerance of belief systems that gave rise to the development of personal meaning structures is an important sign in this relativistic perspective. In these studies, Battista and Almond found 4 things that are commonly found associated with personal meaning, namely;
- People who believe that life meaningful, positively must believe in certain concepts, such as humanistic, religiosity, or idiosyncratic meanings associated with life.
- Concept meaning that they believe in, bring them to achieve consistency of direction and purpose of their lives.
- People who believe that their lives are meaningful, whether their lives have meaning or they are still trying to reach her destiny.
- In the process of achieving their goals for life, in oneself, the feeling would appear significant in themselves and pride in their lives.
b. Existential PerspectivePersonal meaning according to the existentialist perspective of a variety of ideas based philosophy, psychiatry and psychology. Sartre, Kierkegaard, and Nietzsche, all of which are strongly convinced adherents of existentialist one's experience, at a particular time and situation. (May & Yalom, 1995 in Wiebe, 2001). The main objective Humanism - Existentialist is the safety and human perfection.
b.1. Sartre's Existential Perspective
Sartre's views on Existentialism as a Humanism is a doctrine that respects human life, and teaches that every truth and action containing the involvement of environmental and human subjectivity (Sartre in Soejadi, 2001). Sartre argues that humans have the freedom, independence, and as being an autonomous individual. Sartre respect and uphold the personal existence and the subjectivity of life together. Freedom for Sartre is the absolute, no longer limit the freedom other than the limits prescribed by freedom itself. Freedom as the direction and purpose in life as human beings is the nature of personality or selfhood in a way that the person is free from alienation diverse press, and free as well for a full life, unimpeachable, independent and creative. In addition, Sarte also emphasizes that people must be responsible for making his choice. According to him, man must be understood as an autonomous subject, has a unique and existential position. Individuality and essential human personality into it.
b.2. Existential Perspective Omoregbe
Omoregbe (in Soejadi, 2001) said that the implication in the attitudes and actions of humanity, that human freedom according to Sartre and carry out a fundamental way to transcend the world, fostering the spirit of human courage to do more creative and progressive in pursuit of a higher life, provide opportunities to every human person to develop themselves.
Personal Meaning and Meaning definitions
a. According to Maslow's definition of Meaning
Maslow (in Wiebe, 2001) says that the meaning of self-actualization experienced, motivated individuals to know the reason or purpose of existence itself. He also said that every individual has the urge to satisfy their needs from simple to complex needs. Self-actualization is a potential for the greatest achievement in itself, be the best he can do, and achieve the purpose of life itself.
b. Meaning According to the definition of Baumeister
Baumeister (1991), says that the meaning of trust contains several sections that are interconnected between objects, events and relationships. Baumeister stressed that the meaning in the end provide direction, intent on every individual, in which the behavior becomes a goal, rather than just act on instinct or impulse.
c. According to Frankl's definition of Meaning
Frankl (in Wiebe, 2001) conceptualize meaning as an experience in responding to the demands of life, exploring and believe there is a unique task in life, and let her experience or confidence in the overall meaning. Frankl believes that every individual has the capacity to fight a difficult external environment, physically and psychologically resisting the urge to enter into a new dimension of existence itself. This new dimension is the stuff about the meaning, and includes the drive to become a significant and valuable in life.
Frankl in logoterapinya, mentions three assumptions. The first assumption, life has a very broad meaning, including the most painful or there is no hope (free will). Second, that the person who furnished "will to meaning" from birth, that is not the pursuit of power or pleasure, but to find meaning and purpose in life (motivation for living or the will to live meaningful). Third, Frankl believed that people have the freedom to find personal meaning in different situations (meaning life), whether through activities, experiences or attitudes are meaningful.
d. Reker According to the definition of Personal Meaning
According to Reker, Personal meaning is to have a purpose in life, has a direction, a sense of duty and reason to exist (exist), a clear identity and greater social awareness.
"Personal meaning is defined as having a purpose in life, having a sense of direction, a sense of order and a reason for existence, a clear sense of personal identity, and a Greater social consciousness."
(Reker, 1994; Reker & Butler, 1990; Reker et al., 1987; Zika & Chamberlain, 1992)
The definition of personal meaning according to Reker can complement components that determine the success of the change from living the life becomes more meaningful meaningless expressed Bastaman (1996), namely;
- Self-understanding (self-insight); Increased awareness of the poor condition of the current self and a strong desire for change towards a better condition
- The meaning of life (meaning of life); are important values and very meaningful to one's personal life that serves as a purpose in life is to be met and a steering activities
- Changing the attitude (attitude change); It is a process of initially imprecise to be more precise in dealing with the problem, the condition of life or accident.
- Keikatan self (self commitment); is the emergence of a commitment to someone who is characterized by increasingly tied to the meaning of life is found and set life goals
- Directed activity (directed activity); efforts is a conscious and deliberate form of the development of personal potentials (talents, abilities, skills) are positive, and the use of interpersonal relationships to support the achievement of meaning and purpose in life.
- Social support (social support); is the presence of someone or some people are familiar, trustworthy and always willing to provide assistance in times of need.
Basic things that the overlap between the two, namely;
- The purpose of life is meant by Reker (1997), can be considered the same as the meaning of life is Bastaman (1996). Purpose and meaning in life, had the same role as the lead individual in later life.
- Before it has a purpose and meaning in life, the individual will go through stages of self-understanding, namely the search process and the state of self-awareness that results in a purpose or meaning of individual life. Stage of self-understanding can be interpreted as a clear identity in the definition of personal meaning Reker (1997).
- Thereafter, the individual will go through phases of changing attitude, an awareness-raising process that previously did not exactly become more precise in dealing with the problem. This is driven also by a sense of duty and reason to exist (exist) in that individual.
- Then, the individual will go through stages of self keikatan of purpose and meaning of his life.
- Individuals will go to stage targeted activities, which make the effort to achieve goals danmakna life. At this stage the individual has had a clear direction and tangible, which can be done in an attempt to achieve the purpose and meaning in life.
- Social support component expressed Bastaman (1996), a complement component that plays an important role in achieving the purpose and meaning of individual life or personal meaning. While high social consciousness can be regarded as supporting components or result from the achievement of purpose and meaning in life.
Dimensions of MeaningReker and Wong (in Reker & Chamberlain, 2000) collaborated theory, which resulted in 4 dimensions of meaning. Four dimensions of meaning is associated with 1) how the meaning experienced (structural components), 2) the content of experience (sources of meaning), 3) differences in how meaning experienced (breadth), and 4) the quality of the experience of meaningful (depth).
a. Structural components
This explains how the structural components of meaning experienced by a person, which consists of components of cognitive, motivational, and affective, as well as personal and social components.
Cognitive components
Defined as an individual belief system and a holistic view that has been developed in the context of a specific culture and is influenced by individual life experiences are unique. Generally, the fundamental questions which affected the cognitive component is "What am I doing in this life worth?" Or "What makes life meaningful". Therefore, the cognitive component to be part of giving meaning to a life experience. Individuals not only gives the meaning of the belief system or the public gaze, but also an existential search for meaning through the value and purpose of the event or experience of life, environment or difficulties encountered.
Motivational components
Is a value system built on each individual. Value, is a life guidance, which directs what goals to be achieved by someone, and how to achieve that goal. Value is determined by individual needs, beliefs and society. The process for achieving specific goals and their achievement, increase sense of purpose and meaning in one's existence. Motivational component to see personal meaning as a cognitive and behavioral nature, is consistently pursuing its goal and actively participate in activities that are thought useful. This component is most important to keep the individual in order to stay afloat, in the face or over the obstacle, or an extreme traumatic experience.
Affective Components
This component consists of a sense of satisfaction (satisfaction) and the fulfillment or a sense of being met (fulfillment) derived from individual experiences and success to achieve individual goals. Feeling fulfilled is the result of positive thinking in life. Although, the struggle to achieve happiness is not necessarily produce a sense of meaning itself is great, however, a sense of meaning itself would provide a sense of satisfaction in individuals who are struggling.
Reker and Wong (in Reker & Chamberlain, 2000) says that the above three components are interconnected to each other. In a study conducted Ranst and Marcoen (in Reker & Chamberlain, 2001) found that the components of motivational and affective components influence the cognitive component, while the motivational components do not affect each other with the affective component.
Personal and social components (Preconditions of meaning)
Preconditions of meaning consists of social relations and personal qualifications. Social components of personal relationships, love and empathy. Personal component consists of a unique quality to the individual, personal attributes (such as being creative, flexible, adaptive, intellectual, curious, and responsible), which affects personal meaning. Social and personal components act as preconditions of meaning by identifying, individuals such as what to look for meaning.
b. Sources of meaning (the source of meaning)
Source of meaning intended by the content of different areas or themes which the meaning of personal experience. Where does meaning come from? Values and beliefs adalan strong foundation of the source meaning. Value is defined as a construct that exceeds the specific situation and the preferred value of personal and social. Combined value of the possible modes of conduct (instrumental values) and life goals (terminal values) and push for action (Rokeach in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000). Value will be reflected from the individual answers when asked about areas of their lives, of which the meaning comes from.
In addition, based on various quantitative and qualitative research, it was found that the meaning can be derived from sources and specific area, such as cultural and ethnic backgrounds, social, demographic and developmental stage (Devogler, et al in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000) .
Comparison of Theory Resources Meaning Frankl, Wong and Reker
Source of meaning according to Frankl (in Wiebe, 2001)
|
Source of meaning according to WONG (in Wiebe, 2001)
|
Source of meaning according to REKER (in Reker & Chamberlain, 2000)
|
Source of meaning consists of three sources of value, namely;
1. Creative value; what an individual can be given to the world, such as personal success, helping behavior, and so on
2. Value Attitude (attitude); how to deal with situations that individuals can not be changed. Acceptance of this situation, as bad as any situation or condition, called self-transcendence.
3. The value of experience; direct experience in the world, whether good or bad.
|
- Achievement or accomplishment
- Relationship (behavior and skills in relationships with others)
- Religion (faith in greater strength and personal relationship with God)
- Self-Transcendence (focus value in service to others)
- Self Acceptence (treat yourself well and the ability to integrate past mistakes and limitations in the current live and ideals in the future)
- Intimacy (the focus on family and close relationships / sex)
- Fair Treatment (how one is treated and respected in the social environment)
- Fulfillment (a sense of feeling fulfilled and satisfied or happy)
|
- personal relationships
- altruism
- religious activity,
- creative activity,
- development of self,
- find basic needs,
- financial security
- recreational activities
- personal achievement,
- leave a legacy,
- values or ideals that last a long time,
- tradition and culture,
- reasons of social / political
- humanistic concern
- fun activities
- ownership of objects
- relationship with nature.
|
c. Breadth of meaning
Breadth of meaning is the tendency of individuals to experience or gain meaning from several different sources. -Ebersole and Ebersole DeVogler (in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000) stated that generally, individuals gain meaning from various sources, and only a few individuals who only obtain meaning from a single source. Reker and Wong (in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000) states that the individual 1) will experience the meaning of several different sources, and 2) a growing number of sources that have meaning, then that individual will lead to a sense of fulfillment (fulfillment) is greater.
d. Depth of meaning
Depth of meaning indicates the quality of the experience of individual meaning. Does the experience of the individual meaning shallow, deep, or only partially. According to Reker and Wong (in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000), there are four (4) the level of depth that shows the level of meaning experienced by the individual. The fourth level is categorized into depth; self-preoccupation with pleasure and comfort (level 1), the devotion of time and effort to realize our potential (level 2), service to others and commitment to the wider social sphere, or political reasons (level 3), and a nice value that exceeds the individual meanings and pervade the universe, and the ultimate goal of life (level 4). However, O'Connor and Chamberlain (in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000), found it difficult to do the procedure in determining a person's levels of depth according to the criteria outlined depth of meaning Reker and Wong (in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000). Procedure is the difficulty faced by the unequal relationship between the source categories of meaning and levels of depth. For example, the source categories of meaning that one has only to serve others, and thus whether these individuals can be directly incorporated into the level three (3)? According to O'Connor and Chamberlain (in Reker and Chamberlain, 2000), depth is an important dimension of personal meaning for menggamarkan someone, but O'Connor and Chamberlain declared that it was necessary depth of meaning the concept better. Therefore, in this study depth of meaning will not be explored given the still debate the concept of depth of meaning, in order to avoid errors or mistakes in mengintepretasi and analyzing data.
The process of living out a meaningless life becomes more meaningful or discovery of Personal Meaning
Bastaman (1996) look at the meaning of one's life in a process that is a sequence of experiences of living out a meaningless life becomes more meaningful, or by definition Reker called the discovery process personal meaning.
Luke (1986), saw two large sections of the individual who has found personal meaning and individuals who are still searching for personal meaning. Individuals who have yet to find personal meaning can be distinguished form the two sections, namely individuals who are stopped and trapped (stuck) in their search (people in doubt), and individuals who are still actively searching for its personal meaning. While individuals who have found personal meaning is also divided into two, namely the individual who has a pyramidal system of values (people in despair) and individuals who have a parallel system of values.
Kratochvil (in Luke, 1986) revealed that individuals who have a pyramidal system of values is the individual who only has a great value in their lives on the values of another life. While individuals who have a parallel system of values is the individual who has some values that are equally strong in his life, all its value as meaningful.
Kratochvil (in Luke, 1986) also confirms that individuals who have a parallel system of values, are generally healthier and more stable than the individual who has a pyramidal system of values. There are two underlying reasons for thinking this Kratochvil, namely;
- Individuals who have a parallel value system is easier to replace (replace) the value of his loss. For example, a mother who quit a career, still has another achievement in social activities and busy in her household. While the individual with the pyramidal system, the whole concept of life easily confused (Shambles).
- Generally, an individual who only holds a supreme value, tend to be fanatical or can not tolerate a situation in life. For example, a mother who lives only for her child, it is difficult to understand the behavior of other mothers who may entrust their children to go to work.